Log in

Previous 10

Dec. 19th, 2007



Still here, hoping to post substantively soon, just completely wrapped up in life outside the inter-tubes.

For now, a small bit of reality from someone who lived 18+ years of his life 10 miles from Scranton, PA...

There is no paper company named Dunder Mifflin in Scranton. Sorry to shatter your illusions.

Oct. 10th, 2007


The Doctor Imprisoned

Ok, as a fan of the British sci-fi series Dr. Who (recently resurrected by Auntie Beeb - check it out on the SciFi Channel here in the States), this clip almost made me cry from laughter. The actor really is one of the guys that played the good Doctor in the 80s...I love that he was willing to have a bit of fun with the role.

That said, I'm not quite the level of fan...err..."enthusiast" as these dudes.

Not quite.

Jul. 22nd, 2007



Holy Christ-figure, Batman!


Epilogue kinda felt like fan-fiction, though.

Apr. 4th, 2007


Credit where credit is due

Anyone who has even briefly read this blog knows I'm not a fan of President Bush. However, I am willing to admit that, at times, he can be charming. I'm always a fan of self-deprecating humor. I like it when people can laugh at themselves, regardless of their party, and not take things so seriously. That's why I'll give likeability points to Dubya for his performance at the Radio and Television Correspondents' Annual Dinner (transcript here).

My favorite line, regarding his career post-White House:

"Considering what's next -- President Clinton, of course, wrote a very successful presidential memoir, with 10,000 pages or something. I'm thinking of something really fun and creative for mine -- you know, maybe a pop-up book..."

Well played. I still don't and likely never will agree with your politics, but you've earned a grudging "attaboy" from JesterDel.


Early morning, April 4
A shot rings out in the Memphis sky.
Free at last, they took your life
They could not take your pride.

Requiescat in pace, Dr. King

Jan. 24th, 2007


It could be witches, some evil witches

I thought it was 2007, not 1607.

PORT MORESBY, Papua New Guinea (Reuters) -- Four Papua New Guinea women, believed by fellow villagers to have used sorcery to cause a fatal road crash, were tortured with hot metal rods to confess, then murdered and buried standing up in a pit, said police.


Black magic is widespread in the South Pacific nation where most of the 5.1 million population live subsistence lives. Women suspected of being witches are often hung or burned to death.

Local police commander Chief Inspector David Seine told the newspaper that people in the village of Kamex accused the four women of sorcery after a road crash killed three prison officers.

The women were reportedly tortured into admission by being stabbed with hot metal rods, Seine said.

It appeared the women were blindfolded with thick sticky tape strapped across their faces and mouths and their hands had been tied before they were murdered, he said.

Seine said the women were buried in an old narrow toilet pit in the standing position. The pit was then covered with soil and two old vehicle tires placed on the top.

"They planted a banana tree on top of the pit with fresh grass making it difficult for anyone to discover the site, but police got to it with the help of some elders from the village," he said.

Un-freaking-believable. Stabbed with hot metal rods? And I call bullshit on any "I was following my faith, witches are evil" defense. They KNEW what they were doing was wrong, and they tried to cover it up to get away with it. Disgusting.

Jan. 18th, 2007


Where in the World Is JesterDel

Apologies for not updating, once more I'm the globetrotter.

When I return, I'm sure I'll find time to have something halfway interesting to say.


Dec. 14th, 2006


Tasty lead

You have got to be kidding me. Of all the short-sighted bullshit I've seen from this administration, this may be near the top of the list.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Bush administration is considering doing away with health standards that cut lead from gasoline, widely regarded as one of the nation's biggest clean-air accomplishments.

The Environmental Protection Agency said this week that revoking those standards might be justified "given the significantly changed circumstances since lead was listed in 1976" as an air pollutant, claiming that concentrations of lead in the air have dropped more than 90 percent in the past 2 1/2 decades. Battery makers, lead smelters, refiners all have lobbied the administration to do away with the Clean Air Act limits.

But Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., the incoming chairman of the House Committee on Government Reform, called on the agency to "renounce this dangerous proposal immediately," because lead, a highly toxic element, can cause severe nerve damage, especially in children.

"We've done such a good job in eliminating lead from the air, we're free to start contaminating again! Woo hoo!" This is absolutely ridiculous. What's next, putting asbestos back in buildings, since we've been so successful in removing it? Do these people really not give a damn about public health?

Oh, I forgot. We don't need to worry about environmental damage or long-term health issues. The Rapture's gonna take all the really good people any time now, anyway. They can f*ck up the planet, 'cause God's gonna give 'em a big cosmic "do-over".

Dec. 5th, 2006


Why Don't We Get Drunk and Screw?

Ok, Bausch and Lomb have too damn much money on their hands. They're the ones responsible for this study.

'Beer goggles' effect explained

Alcohol is not the only factor in the beer goggles formula

Scientists believe they have worked out a formula to calculate how "beer goggles" affect a drinker's vision.


An = number of units of alcohol consumed
S = smokiness of the room (graded from 0-10, where 0 clear air; 10 extremely smoky)
L = luminance of 'person of interest' (candelas per square metre; typically 1 pitch black; 150 as seen in normal room lighting)
Vo = Snellen visual acuity (6/6 normal; 6/12 just meets driving standard)
d = distance from 'person of interest' (metres; 0.5 to 3 metres)

The drink-fuelled phenomenon is said to transform supposedly "ugly" people into beauties - until the morning after.

Researchers at Manchester University say while beauty is in the eye of the beer-holder, the amount of alcohol consumed is not the only factor.

Additional factors include the level of light in the pub or club, the drinker's own eyesight and the room's smokiness.

The distance between two people is also a factor.

They all add up to make the aesthetically-challenged more attractive, according to the formula.

The formula can work out a final score, ranging from less than one - where there is no beer goggle effect - to more than 100.

Nathan Efron, Professor of Clinical Optometry at the University of Manchester, said: "The beer goggles effect isn't solely dependent on how much alcohol a person consumes, there are other influencing factors at play too.

"For example, someone with normal vision, who has consumed five pints of beer and views a person 1.5 metres away in a fairly smoky and poorly lit room, will score 55, which means they would suffer from a moderate beer goggle effect."

The research was commissioned by eyecare firm Bausch & Lomb PureVision.

A poll showed that 68% of people had regretted giving their phone number to someone to whom they later realised they were not attracted.

A formula rating of less than one means no effect. Between one and 50 the person you would normally find unattractive appears less "visually offensive".

Non-appealing people become suddenly attractive between 51 and 100. At more than 100, someone not considered attractive looks like a super model.

I can just see people frantically making these calculations on the back of a napkin in a smoky bar as the night starts winding to a close.

On second thought...no, I can't. The people that would be doing that probably wouldn't be out at a bar, anyway. They'd be at home (parent's basement) constructing their own robot lady.

Nov. 28th, 2006


So long, and thanks for all the fish

Whales, apparently, are smarter than we realized.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Humpback whales have a type of brain cell seen only in humans, the great apes, and other cetaceans such as dolphins, U.S. researchers reported on Monday.

This might mean such whales are more intelligent than they have been given credit for, and suggests the basis for complex brains either evolved more than once, or has gone unused by most species of animals, the researchers said.

The finding may help explain some of the behaviors seen in whales, such as intricate communication skills, the formation of alliances, cooperation, cultural transmission and tool usage, the researchers report in The Anatomical Record.

Patrick Hof and Estel Van der Gucht of the Department of Neuroscience at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York studied the brains of humpback whales and discovered a type of cell called a spindle neuron in the cortex, in areas comparable to where they are seen in humans and great apes.


The humpbacks also had structures that resembled "islands" in the cerebral cortex, also seen in some other mammals.

These islands may have evolved in order to promote fast and efficient communication between neurons, the researchers said.


"In spite of the relative scarcity of information on many cetacean species, it is important to note in this context that sperm whales, killer whales, and certainly humpback whales, exhibit complex social patterns that included intricate communication skills, coalition-formation, cooperation, cultural transmission and tool usage," the researchers wrote.

"It is thus likely that some of these abilities are related to comparable histologic complexity in brain organization in cetaceans and in hominids."

So, apparently, it's only a matter of time before a big ol' alien probe shows up and starts boiling the oceans to punish us for killing off humpbacks.

Man, I'm such a dork.

Previous 10